Reviews// Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception

Posted 24 Oct 2011 17:00 by
Back in the mists of time, I reviewed Uncharted: Drake's Fortune for SPOnG, and I found it to be an extremely enjoyable game, if a little too short.

More recently, I reviewed Uncharted 2: Among Thieves for SPOnG and I found it to be a much more enjoyable game, but still too short in the single player campaign.

Now Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception has hit my desk, and plus ca change? I am once again playing it for the SPOnG review. I am once again enjoying it greatly. In a few hours I finished the game... let's see what I think.

There has always been something confusing about the relationship between Nathan Drake and Sulliver S. Sullivan, or whatever he's called (He's called Victor Sullivan. Ed.). What bonded these two men of clearly different generations but not related by blood? Not by their own blood at least!

At last, in the opening scenes of Uncharted 3 all is revealed. Like something from the second series of Hustle, Sully took the rough but promising young scallywag that was Drake as a rough but promising street thief, and turned him into a rough but promising international tomb thief. Brings a tear to my eye.

I had the temerity all those years ago, to pronounce Drake's Fortune, as similar to Tomb Raider. Teh Internetz immediately pronounced me a l4mer and a n00b, but I was unrepentant! To me the similarities between the two games were blatant and obvious, and Uncharted 3 does precious little to put light between the two franchises. It does even less to distinguish itself from the two previous Uncharted games. For many, this will be a good thing. After all, when it is not broken, why fix it?

But there were times during Drake 3 that I thought, for all the world, that I was playing one of the predecessor games. The landscape, the scenery and the atmosphere are so similar as to be indistinguishable. Even the set-up and the pacing of the game are similar. Initially, Drake has to use stealth until he can snag himself a weapon... Early levels take place in a jungle environment... Certain pieces of the architecture are so similar that you flash-back to the previous games...

Cinema Paradiso?
As a series, Uncharted has never made any secret of its desire to be cinematic. This has been the the previous game's credit. Developer, Naughty Dog, managed to graft a credible storyline with good voice acting and snappy dialogue onto a compelling game. But as with all things cinematic: Jaws, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, The Godfathers, there is a law of diminishing returns. You can only peddle the same package a limited number of times (approximately 2.00000) before people expect and want something a little different.

While I thought that the first two games were excellent, it would be nice to see some progress in the series; there has been precious little. Sure there is some exposition of the back story, and the plot is cinematic... though to be honest the dialogue is a little more lacklustre than in Drake 2

Otherwise it's business as usual. Drake has a handful of clues to a long-lost massive treasure, and he and a band of associates traipse around the globe seeking to find it. Along the way a band of antagonists keep shooting at you.

Except, that is, for when they get you up close and unarmed, at which point they tell you their plot to rule the world, and leave you unattended strapped to a threshing machine. OK, maybe that's not what they do - but it's pretty similar. Despite the baddies spending all of the in-game scenes trying to kill you, as soon as you get to a cutscene, you are spared.

The cutscenes in this game feature a new set of characters, woven into a typical Indiana Jones and The Mummy's Tomb Raider-style yarn. This game introduces the characters of Cutter and Katherine Marlowe, and it's clear that Naughty Dog has been considering the prospect of that Uncharted movie, because these characters are clearly designed to be played by Jason Statham and Helen Mirren respectively.

The story weaves its way around the globe but is noticeably devoid of any specific deception. At least, any deception that is any more pivotal to the storyline than usual.

In an old-fashioned, Saturday morning cliffhanger style, Drake's games have always had their share of narrative surprises. The title of this instalment could easily be referring to the part where Drake SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT or to the part where Sully SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT, or even the part where Elena SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT. To be honest, there is no major central deception in the plot.
-1- 2 3   next >>

Read More Like This


Comments

Really? 28 Oct 2011 00:49
1/8
This review is biased and inane.

You suck. Go play MW3 you f**k.
Really? 28 Oct 2011 00:56
2/8
Also, your link to Naughty Dog saying that the graphics don't represent a leap over Uncharted 2? You lied - and should be ashamed.

They say in their response to your question about graphics that EVERYTHING has been improved over Uncharted 2. Why lie in your review when anyone can simply click the link to the other article and see that you are blatantly lying?

Sponge has always been synonymous with inane and ignorant reporting - in some cases accusations of pay-offs and in other cases accusations of flat-out lying simply to acquire site hits.

F**k you and die.
more comments below our sponsor's message
Tim Smith 28 Oct 2011 14:35
3/8
@Really?

Yup, what I said in the other thread that you decided to troll.
Richard Oxer 28 Oct 2011 22:27
4/8
Harsh words from Really. No need to stew in your own hatred for what I know to be a passionate site, first hand. I spent nearly five years there - they're not bad guys without moral gaming fibre. But they ARE critical, and so they should be. A review is a judgement afterall.

And let's be honest. How many reviews are truly unbiased? An RPG fan will likely review an RPG game - what do you think will happen? You could give this game to a fan of Dressage Simulator (it probably exists) and it would be impartial and objective. But at the same time, the words would be meaningless.

And the visuals? Sure it's the best-looking game on the system... but think back to the water-drenched brick walls of Shambala in its immediate predecessor. Is U3 really that much better?

I've spent nearly seven years continuing to read this site in the shadow of Wakefield House, and I stilll get a kick out of it. And as I prove by mashing away at the keyboard right now, sometimes I can't help but bite back. Maybe I'm biased too.

Out of curiosity Really - I assume you've completed the game yourself?

SPOnG - sometimes I miss you guys.
SamJM 1 Nov 2011 15:51
5/8
As much as I think I will disagree with these comments when I pick the game up tomorrow, I respect that this is indeed your opinion and it will more than likely differ from mine. Hence I think the people on here who are kicking up a fuss over the fact that you have some problems with the game need to grow up. If they don't like the review, don't follow it, make up your own god damn minds.
TheSonicMole 1 Nov 2011 16:03
6/8
@Really?

It's an opinion. The reviewer is free to have one that differs to your own.

And why so angry? Your underwear too tight today?
Tom 19 Nov 2011 16:15
7/8
The game is overrated.

I think 85% for the same game is far too much.

This is Uncharted 2.5 dosen't deserves more than 85% for me.
AmandaGames 10 Dec 2011 19:01
8/8
RRS187 is a Nazi moderator on the Reddead dot us website. This German bitch bans anyone with different views then he has or if they don't get along with his fellow cheaters corvettezr1-13 and cuban_gang_alex. The Reddead dot us website has become a safe haven for the biggest cheaters on Red Dead Redemption. Several people have complained about him but the site administrators have failed to act. This nazi bitch is also a cheater on Red Dead Redemption for the Platstation 3. He uses a modded PS3 console with an aimbot and a modified controller. This bitch needs to get a life and stop abusing what little power he has.
Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.