Following the UK Government's rejection of tax breaks for the games industry, ELSPA director-general Michael Rawlinson spoke of how Treasury officials told him that the evidence for tax incentives was not “sufficiently compelling”.With the Government's Pre-Budget Report (PBR) snubbing the games sector altogether, Rawlinson told
GamesIndustry that he wasn't surprised at the outcome; “The Treasury has a fundamental dislike for sector-specific tax measures, so we went saying 'games industry, we're different from everybody else', and that goes against their fundamentals.”
When pressed for an explanation to the PBR rejection, the Treasury told Rawlinson that it disagreed with the argument that “if fiscal measures weren't put in place, the industry would decline and the skilled workforce would leave the British economy.”
“If there were 3,000 jobs lost to Canada that was 3,000 people that were no longer going to be employed in the UK. And the Treasury said they didn't believe that would be the case", Rawlinson explained. “They thought a reasonable proportion of those people would go and find other jobs using their skills in the British economy. Therefore the overall effect to the British economy would not be so devastating.”
It's a rather cavalier attitude to take, given that job losses are expected to peak at 2.8 million in 2010. There has been a lot of activity in support of games industry tax breaks in the past, with Tiga chairman Richard Wilson
recently outlining a plan that would benefit the economy and stave off redundancies.
Rawlinson said that the tax proposal is “not dead” but “it won't be happening for a while given the current economic climate”, stating that the package may have to be modified to include 'animation, TV and film'. In any case, ELSPA is looking for alternative solutions. "We can't be fixated on just one solution... The Government are investing in our sector and in videogames directly and we need to look at ways we can extract more value from that relationship", says Mr Rawlinson.