Enjoy a Nice, Long Drawn Out Wink with Lara on Xbox 360

New teaser video released today.

Posted by Staff
Making what is the 767,892nd reference to masturbation in relation to Eidos’ Lara Croft, SPOnG is pleased to offer the new high-definition trailer of Tomb Raider: Legend.

This video, its focal point squarely if predictably bang on Ms Croft’s bosom, is lifted from the teaser footage prepared for X05, and very nice it looks too. Have a good, long look for yourself:

Large MPEG4 Xvid (1200x720 24.2Mb)
Medium MPEG4 Xvid (640x360 6.2Mb)
Large Windows Media (1200x720 12.2Mb)
Medium Windows Media (640x360 4.9Mb)

While you're waiting for the video to download, check out the stills from the movie on the right.

As you’ll see, this is something of a return to the roots for the series, with the Tomb Raider heroine actually raiding tombs, rather than jetting around the world on some ill-developed spin-off storyline – something that SPOnG joins the series’ loyal fans in celebrating.

We’ll bring you much more on all things Tomb Raider: Legend in the coming months so keep your third eye peeled.

Comments

config 5 Oct 2005 17:34
1/16
Phwoar! Bouncy tits, too! Bouncy tits are the future of videogames... or so it would seem.
elvisripley 5 Oct 2005 18:09
2/16
Broken video links?
more comments below our sponsor's message
OptimusP 5 Oct 2005 18:39
3/16
Lara looks a lot like that girl from Beyond Good & Evil only with a bit more polygons in this game.
Looking back at how good Leon looked in RE4 and this doesn't really improve on that...'this could run on the Gamecube' next-gen game #i lost count after a hunderd.

Seriously, are gears of War and MGS4 the only games that actually look next-gen without having N64-esque framerate drops or what?
Greg2k 5 Oct 2005 19:50
4/16
I'm getting broken links here. Neither of the 4 videos will load (404)
fluffstardx 5 Oct 2005 21:44
5/16
OptimusP wrote:
Seriously, are gears of War and MGS4 the only games that actually look next-gen without having N64-esque framerate drops or what?


Have you seen the Prey footage? Smooth as, and a massive leap in graphics AND physics. Well worth the look if you can find it.

I wasn't all that impressed with MGS4; yeah I know, they said it wasn't pre-rendered, but that's what EA siad about "that" madden picture...
kid_77 5 Oct 2005 21:56
6/16
That Gears of War video is about the only thing that's really impressed me so far; mainly because it's in-game. Looks like a slightly more manic RE4. RE5 will, of course, be ridiculously good.
fluffstardx 5 Oct 2005 23:58
7/16
The in-game footage of Condemned's nice too though, and the aforementioned Prey footage. Kameo still looks a little rough, but that's probably down to the video quality of the capture.

I suppose we'll have to wait til nearer launch, really.
LUPOS 6 Oct 2005 04:40
8/16
fluffstardx wrote:

I suppose we'll have to wait til nearer launch, really.


wheres our man ont he groud at x05? any comment? i know condemend looked decent at e3 but it also had like half the effects turned off so it could run in hi-def... a terible mistake on MS's part, they required everything being shown to be running in HD so alot of the people demoing said that a lot of the stuff would have looked better if they could have just outputed the lower res..... but anyway, anythign really strike you as "next gen"?

i personaly think oblivion is pretty stagering... just the vegetation alone... so far to me it already looks to put far cry to shame in that respect.

______________

config 6 Oct 2005 08:10
9/16
Links have been corrected. I am a dunce who was in to much of a rush to get to the pub. Pologies.
king skins 6 Oct 2005 09:48
10/16
OptimusP wrote:
Seriously, are gears of War and MGS4 the only games that actually look next-gen without having N64-esque framerate drops or what?


Have you seen the Project Gotham Racing 3 videos? that looks amazing!

http://www.xboxlive.fr/news_affiche_3211.html

For SPOnG:
Your URL creator doesn't work and the bold/italic/image/etc buttons don't work as well.

I get a javaScript error, line 106, 'null' is null or not an object
config 6 Oct 2005 09:58
11/16
king skins wrote:

Your URL creator doesn't work and the bold/italic/image/etc buttons don't work as well.

I get a javaScript error, line 106, 'null' is null or not an object


It's working fine here with Firefox/Mozilla, IE6 on Win. Seems to a be a problem with Safari on Mac. Which browser version and OS are you using?
king skins 6 Oct 2005 10:06
12/16
config wrote:
king skins wrote:

Your URL creator doesn't work and the bold/italic/image/etc buttons don't work as well.

I get a javaScript error, line 106, 'null' is null or not an object


It's working fine here with Firefox/Mozilla, IE6 on Win. Seems to a be a problem with Safari on Mac. Which browser version and OS are you using?


IE6 on WinXP Pro with SP2... Just tried it in Mozilla... works fine with that just not IE.
config 6 Oct 2005 13:20
13/16
Hmm. This is really puzzling. I'm replying with IE6 on XP Pro SP2, and the buttons are fine.

Could you let me know the exact version of IE6?

Mine is 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519

More annoying is the fact that line 106 in the button hander script is a curly bracket "{" - hardly cause for a null object error. With each passing day I become more convinced IE declares every error as an null object, and picks a random line number.
king skins 6 Oct 2005 13:40
14/16
I have exactly the same version of IE as you do. Full error details:
Line: 106
Char: 7
Error: 'null' is null or not an object
Code: 0
URL: http://forums.spong.com/en/html/forum/post.jsp?forum=9&thread=2580&message=16652&mode=reply"e=t


Not sure it that helps ya. Also IE sometimes reports the wrong line numbers and the error is on the line after the "{".

As your bug fixing ;) I just followed the link in my email to your reply and was automatically logged in, but I couldn't reply to your post as the Reply button was missing... had to logout and then back in to reply
wanderingsoul 6 Oct 2005 23:13
15/16
Underwhelmed. Her best days are behind her. Definitely. Just check out that ass ;)

haha but seriously it doesn't look all that special yet. A tad more flashy than current gen. That's about it.
jadnice 7 Oct 2005 01:23
16/16
That trailer is a joke. There is nothing impressive about it.
Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.