The Wii Game and Mainstream Media Agenda

And they won't take it any more

Posted by Staff
The Wii Game and Mainstream Media Agenda
The man who founded The Daily Mail as the world's first people's tabloid once said this about journalism, "A profession whose business is to explain to others what it personally does not understand".

He would, therefore, be proud of the recent coverage given to SEGA's MadWorld Wii title by his own newspaper - which has also been picked up by Rupert Murdoch's ever reliable The Sun. The game is due out in 2009 and as such does not need to have been sent to PEGI or the BBFC for classification and rating.

The Mail's angsty rage is summed up as follows, "A new computer game tipped to be the most violent ever is being released exclusively on the so-called 'family friendly' Wii console."

The paper , which headlines the story as "Parents horrified as most violent video game ever to launch on 'family friendly' Wii" follows this up with the statement that "The decision to release a violent game on a console which has based its reputation on family fun has shocked anti-violence pressure groups."

Nowhere in the article are any 'parents' quoted. In fact only one pressure group is quoted: Mediawatch-UK. This group was set up in the 1960s by Mary Whitehouse and, although able to comment on video games, places itself in the role of moral guardian for the United Kingdom's viewing and listening habits.

Northcliffe's paper quotes Mediawatch UK director, John Beyer as stating, "This game sounds very unsavoury.

"I hope the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) will view this with concern and decide it should not be granted a classification."

It 'sounds' unsavoury? Obviously Mr Beyer has not yet seen the game, yet he still wants it banned by the BBFC. That's what we call moral guardianship. In case we're wrong and for some reason The Daily Maul (sic) has misquoted the watchdog, we contacted Mediawatch-UK to clarify.

We were told by Mr Beyer, "I can confirm that the remarks attributed to me in the Daily Mail online are accurate. Thank you for asking."

We've also had a quick look at MWUK's recent watchdogging to discover what it's made of a recent BBC Radio production of a Gaius Suetonius book. This contains incest, knife crime, the castration of a man so that another man could have sex with him as a if he was a woman and much, much more. It is also being paid for by British tax payers and played out on national radio! It's called 'On the Life of the Ceasars'!

According to Mr Beyer's next quote, "I believe it (MadWorld) will spoil the family fun image of the Wii". Surely, allowing such Ceasar-based filth and violence to be broadcast when EVEN CHILDREN can hear it, must surely decimate the reputation of your domestic wireless and of the BBC in general!

Back to the Maul itself, Of course nowhere in the article itself is the tipster or tipsters actually named. Therefore, we can only assume that this should read, "The Daily Mail tips..."

Let's get some Daily Mail context shall we? A quick search of its website brings up the following fair and balanced coverage of 'video games', glancing over it you might stumble over the thought that some kind of rabble-rousing, curtain twitching agenda is in place:

'Violent video game that 'encourages players to kill' is banned again' - Manhunt 2 related - October 2007.

'Babysitters kill girl, 7, with Mortal Kombat video game moves' - the murder of Zoe Garcia - December 2007.

'Teenager stabbed in queue at midnight launch of ultra-violent video game Grand Theft Auto IV' - self-explanatory - April 2008.

'Man stabbed queueing for midnight launch of ultra-violent video game Grand Theft Auto IV' - self-explanatory - April 2008.

'Violent video game that features beatings and drive-by shootings 'set for huge success' - the possible success of GTA IV - April 2008.

'Europe opens first detox clinic for video game addicts' - self-explanatory - June 2006.

'Cathedral officials' outrage over terror video game' - regarding Koch's War on Terror game - May 2006.

It has to be said that the makers of the game aren't helping the cause with their confused justification for the game's violence. Says the website blurb, "Often times, brutality is expressed in a spiteful nature. There are already plenty of games out there that hit this mark; however, we decided that MADWORLD’s brutality should be aimed at providing the user with a sense of exhilaration during play.

"To give you an example from gameplay, we have a scene where you can pull a street sign from the ground and shove it into a enemy’s head. However, I thought that it is much more fun to stab someone with a sign that actually has some sort of meaning as opposed to a knife. We tried the idea out, and the reaction amongst the team was so positive, I knew this was the way to proceed."

Erm, right. Stabbing someone with a sign is more fun and with a knife.

The debate continues...

Sources:
The Daily Mail.
SEGA

Companies:
Games:

Comments

dave 13 Aug 2008 17:47
1/11
Hm...

Obviously there's little point pointing fingers at the Daily Mail, since they've set a fine precedent for completely found-less sensationalising and fear-mongering - it's what they do best, and freedom of the press is as important as free speech, so fair play to them, and fair play to anyone and everyone who wishes to point out they're a bunch of reactionary, regressive bigots who ought to go back to worrying about who killed Diana (maybe it was something to do with Rockstar Games).

The question really ought to be - who is paying Mr Beyer to make groundless condemnations? I too went to the MadWorld website and read the (frankly amateurish and embarrassing) press release info. Then I watched the demo video. To be honest, it all looks rather lame. There's far worse violence to be found all over the place. Films, books, TV shows, music, art, other computer games - in all of them you can find examples of extremely graphic and gratuitous violence. But there's a few things to remember - firstly, simulated violence hasn't yet been proven to be a bad thing; the Romans believed it was important that all citizens expressed their innate blood lust at gladiatorial (and other, similarly brutal) contests. Secondly, just because the Nintendo Wii has a reputation as a "family" console does not mean that its games must all be family-friendly. Owning a Wii does not compel the owner to buy any games they don't want - if these mysterious hypothetical parents are concerned about the idea of their children playing MadWorld, then the simple solution is to ensure they don't play it.

I'd contend that most children wouldn't enjoy MadWorld anyway - I suspect most adults wouldn't either, but at any rate, the black white and red colour scheme is likely to prove too boring and old-fashioned for young and adolescent (mostly male) thrill-seekers.

And what makes this the most violent game ever? The fact you can stab your opponent in the head with a road sign?? Please, there was a sound (but not, in my opinion, valid) argument against Manhunt 2 on the grounds that it encouraged and emphasised a link between sex and violence (but what action film doesn't?), but frankly the original Mortal Combat was just as violent as MadWorld, if not more so.

Oh and as for "On the life of the Caesars", at least that has historical merit - for a real catalogue of gratuitous horror and depravity, look no further than the Bible, available everywhere to everyone, with no classification whatsoever.
Joji 13 Aug 2008 19:05
2/11
Get over here! Boom!

There's that immortal cry of MK's Scorpion, as he spears you through his head, drags you over to him and unleashes a mighty uppercut.

If MK could get away with this, Madworld won't have any trouble. Besides like you said, the abstract artstyle alone says ''THIS IS NOT REAL'', in an almost Okami like way.

While the BBFC might object to its violence, its in no way in any comparitive way to Manhunt 2. I still think both deserve to be options to adult gamers. Adult gamers is still a concept the mainstream have yet to grasp. The mainstream need a reality check, fast.

Games are only gonna get more realistic and violent if that's what gamers demand, and it was always gonna be this way. Face the cold hard fact that violence sells and we love it (in and sometime out of our media), even in this utopian like modern world we are in. IN truth we are only a few pages away from when the romans were here. At least they knew that violence is not always a bad thing as its constantly painted.

And the true face of irony, is that such Daily Mail writers/readers etc, will turn a blind eye to real violence, showing how truly stupid they are to link games and the real mc'coy.

Doh!

more comments below our sponsor's message
tweek 14 Aug 2008 23:29
3/11
I posted a long comment on this storys page questioning the journalistic integrity of this story.

strangely enough it hasn't made it through "moderation" yet...

funny that
tyrion 15 Aug 2008 07:34
4/11
tweek wrote:
I posted a long comment on this storys page questioning the journalistic integrity of this story.

strangely enough it hasn't made it through "moderation" yet...

funny that

Umm, there isn't any pre-approval moderation on any of our forums, if there was and we were worried about criticism, we wouldn't have let this post through either. We've had plenty of people criticise us on our own forums, we prefer to engage with people who don't like our approach rather than brush them under the carpet.

If you're willing to write your comment out again, please post it here or send it directly to tim@spong.com.
TimSpong 15 Aug 2008 08:40
5/11
tweek wrote:
I posted a long comment on this storys page questioning the journalistic integrity of this story.

strangely enough it hasn't made it through "moderation" yet...

funny that


I agree with Tyrion of course. However, do you mean that you posted to The Daily Mail or to SPOnG?

Cheers

Tim
tweek 15 Aug 2008 09:33
6/11
Tim Smith wrote:
tweek wrote:
I posted a long comment on this storys page questioning the journalistic integrity of this story.

strangely enough it hasn't made it through "moderation" yet...

funny that


I agree with Tyrion of course. However, do you mean that you posted to The Daily Mail or to SPOnG?

Cheers

Tim


apologies, should have been clearer - i meant the original articles page on dailymail.co.uk
TimSpong 15 Aug 2008 09:45
7/11
tweek wrote:
apologies, should have been clearer - i meant the original articles page on dailymail.co.uk


No worries at all - please feel free to reprint it here.

Ta

Tim

tweek 15 Aug 2008 10:24
8/11
Tim Smith wrote:
tweek wrote:
apologies, should have been clearer - i meant the original articles page on dailymail.co.uk


No worries at all - please feel free to reprint it here.

Ta

Tim


Can't remember the exact wording and unfortunately I didnt make a copy, but the whole article seemed just shody and badly researched. It states that Nintendo is spoiling the image of wii when its clearly Sega that produces this game. They also don't quite seem to get that it is entirely encumbant on parents and retailers to keep what is clearly a game directed at adults out of childrens hands.
The way the article goes on makes it seem that Madworld is a game nasty in the same style as the Manhunt series when its quite clear that the violence and style of the game is clearly comic in style and anime in influence. There was just as much blood in the school play scene in the first Addams Family film and that was a PG!
It seemed to me that they clearly believed anything this pressure group told them.

I personally believe we should be holding these media outlets to account more. The freedom of the press is very important but they also have a responsibility to print fair and balanced material. This seems to me to be neither.
TimSpong 15 Aug 2008 10:29
9/11
tweek wrote:
I personally believe we should be holding these media outlets to account more. The freedom of the press is very important but they also have a responsibility to print fair and balanced material. This seems to me to be neither.


Agreed on the first bit. The second bit, however, was summed up by Lachlan Murdoch as follows, "The industry is littered with self-styled purists who believe the business of media.. the requirement to make a profit.. somehow corrupts the craft."

Yes, the business of news is not to communicate news, it is to make profit. Jebus, didn't we all know that? What are you, some kind of Communist?

Someone bring my (flying) Zonda round, I need to get to my yacht off the Maldives in order to eat a truffle sandwich off the stomach of Miss World.

Cheers

Tim
tweek 15 Aug 2008 10:44
10/11
Tim Smith wrote:

Someone bring my (flying) Zonda round, I need to get to my yacht off the Maldives in order to eat a truffle sandwich off the stomach of Miss World.

LOL!!
tyrion 15 Aug 2008 15:52
11/11
tweek wrote:
apologies, should have been clearer - i meant the original articles page on dailymail.co.uk

My apologies for insinuating you were being disparaging against our site when you were in fact having a go at the Mail.
Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.