Analysts cast doubt on PSP's potential success

Will this really be a Walkman for the 21st Century?

Posted by Staff
Analysts cast doubt on PSP's potential success
Industry analysts have been casting doubt over the potential success of Sony's PSP handheld, dismissing the ambition of creating a 'Walkman for the 21st Century' as mere marketing rhetoric. "I don't think Sony has hard data to back up their sales target of three million units," said Takashi Oka, game industry analyst at UFJ Tsubasa Securities. The main problem seems to be the uncertain price point, which makes it difficult for developers to fathom the tastes and preferences of the market. Without enough active support from developers, the PSP would lack the prerequisite catalogue of titles to make a suitable impact at launch.

Some observers are sceptical as to whether or not Sony's latest product will have the necessary appeal to either extend the handheld market into older age groups, or to usurp Nintendo from its position at the top of the sector as it stands. The GBA already has an established and loyal fan base, and Nintendo's DS revelations have also been causing quite a stir. On top of that, concerns have been raised about Sony's ability to deliver the product for its pre-Christmas target, and these worries will only be exasperated by the projected shortfall in LCD production.

Retailers, however, have showed more confidence, citing Sony's previous successes in marketing its PlayStation products to a fresh audience. They also suggest that gadgetry has an inherently contagious appeal: the initial customers will be expected to flash their wares at their friends and colleagues at every available opportunity, which in turn could stimulate a faddish buying frenzy in the weeks that that follow the first release.

Providing that Sony can keep the PSP price point at a low enough level and in good time for Christmas (outside of Europe), a relative success is probable. However, as far as analysts are concerned, there is little scope for the new machine to significantly affect Sony's overall profitability.
Companies:

Comments

schnide 1 Jun 2004 10:07
1/11
There are two things that concern me in Sony making this a success - the vulnerability of the screen and the slight obscurity of the media format.

There's no doubt that there's interest in the PSP and a higher price tag that the GBA or DS won't be enough to turn people away.

Tell me you haven't considered whether you might end up getting one or not, I dare you..
ohms 1 Jun 2004 10:23
2/11
There's no way I can get it till it's under £100.
I was quite hyped about the idea of a portable PS2, but now I just want a DS.
more comments below our sponsor's message
Deviluck 1 Jun 2004 11:04
3/11
I do not think the UMD system is obscure, i think its genius, it will be released all over, and FF7 AC is being released on it and thats cool.

In reply to the other guy.
Why get a DS, there is no innovation in the design whatsoever, just check the last piece of DS news and check the link, to the original Nintendo Game and watch, its pretty much the same console.

Im going to pay for the PSP even if it is over 100. because it provides for all needs.
ohms 1 Jun 2004 12:25
4/11
lol, yeah, I'd like a PSP too at some point, the potential of that sytem is HUGE, but I just can't afford it. It's likely that the DS will retail for £100+ initially too, but from what I saw at E3, it has more games that I'd want to play. My major concern isn't how 'cool' the system looks (although the DS design isn't finilised anyway). The PSP is unarguably cooler, but the way the DS uses the touch screen like no other games ever have... that's the Nintendo innovation I've been missing.

Seeing Animal Crossing on the DS was enough to sell it to me. :)
Cream the Rabbit 1 Jun 2004 12:46
5/11
I happily spunked away £300 on an iPod, pretty much only because it "looked cool" and I wanted to be seen holding one on the tube.

Stupid vain people like me may well ensure PSP's success :)

(I have since sold the Pod, after realising that it actually made me look like an idiotic poser fully ripe for a mugging).


Funky 1 Jun 2004 13:15
6/11
I hear there's going to be some sort of screen cover for the PSP
Joji 1 Jun 2004 13:50
7/11
PSP does come with a screen cover, but most folk will probably loose it. With the SP and the DS you dont have to worry about that stuff, since the clamshell design takes care of it nicely.

PSP has the street cred factor tied down no probs. It's main problem or a worry if I had one would be the UMD laser. It this packs up, whether you'd be able to get it fixed will be a major factor. PS2 had a similar problem resulting in folk returning them with their crys fallling on deaf ears, then having to buy another one (no wonder PS2 sold so many).

I still want and will buy both, but the DS will be in my pocket when I leave the house. As for the DS stylus, I wouldn't be surprised if you could get replacements from Nintendo later on, if it gets lost. Maybe Sony might do the same for the screen cover, who knows.
SPInGSPOnG 1 Jun 2004 16:07
8/11
Analysts are, to a man, w****rs who don't have a clue what they are talking about. They exist purely as a way of blame avoidance for employees in corporations.

You see, rather than saying "I think this, and we should do this" corporate drones commision a report from a bunch of analysts and base their recommendation on the results of this report. That way when everything turns to s**t, the drone keeps his job, and recommends chaging there analysts/consultants.

Lets face it "analysts" are basically just soothsayers and fortune tellers dressed in Brooks Brothers suits.
Mecha Ghandi 1 Jun 2004 16:19
9/11
"Lets face it "analysts" are basically just soothsayers and fortune tellers dressed in Brooks Brothers suits."

they're JUST soothsayers and fortune tellers?

Personally, I trust the verdict of anyone who can see into the future. Russel Grant excepted.
Pandaman 1 Jun 2004 19:15
10/11
Reporters report that a new product going up against the 97% market share holder may potentially not be succesful. In other news, the sun came up today.
DoctorDee 2 Jun 2004 10:19
11/11
Mecha Ghandi wrote:

>they're JUST soothsayers and fortune tellers?
>
>Personally, I trust the verdict of anyone who can
>see into the future. Russel Grant excepted.

any fule kno that soothsayers and fortune tellers are not people who CAN see into the future, they are people who CLAIM THEY CAN see into the future.

A suybtle distinction, but one that has had the better of many an idiot.
Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.