Reviews// Flower

“It's a game for freaking goddamn hippies!”

Posted 9 Feb 2009 16:01 by
Companies:
Games: Flower
“This is a sissy-boy game!”

“Is this Sonic the Flower?”

“This looks like the game equivalent of a Murakami novel – long, soporific and slow.”

“It's a game for freaking goddamn hippies!”

That's a selection of the comments that were flung my way when various other SPOnGers stumbled back into the Underwater Castle after lunch, half addled by booze and cold, to find me sat contentedly playing Flower.

Flower, if you haven't come across it before, is the latest offering from thatgamecompany, the company behind flOw (Flower, see?). Sony appears to have invented a whole new genre just to describe their output – 'Zen Gaming'. That's the sort of pretentious bollocks that makes me want to throw up in my shoes then throw them at whoever said it, but in this case... well, it pretty much fits.

Also, I've just been playing Flower so I'm currently experiencing a state of serenity only usually achieved by taking large quantities of illicit substances, so I don't want to throw my shoe at anyone. You could walk into the SPOnG Underwater Castle, pour acid on my lap and tell me Rachel Bilson is a shit-eating-whore and I still would not throw my vomit-filled shoe at you.

Are you getting an idea of what Flower's like yet? In the game you play Etherea, Goddess of the wind and clouds, a disenchanted spirit who seeks to rejuvenate the land around... Sorry. That's not true. Well, it's possible that's true, but you'd never know because Flower isn't burdened by one of those story things that bogs down so many other releases – at least not explicitly, anyway.

You control the wind (or the first Flower petal you pick up, it's kind of difficult to tell), blissfully steering the slices of colour across a stunning landscape, brushing past other petals to pick them up as you go. Successfully doing this will prompt the landscape around you to revitalise, spilling colour across your surroundings.

You control your petals using the Sixaxis and the the Sixaxis only. The only other thing you have to do is hold any button you like to make sure you keep moving. Beyond that it's all motion control.

And... that's the game, really. And that, frankly, is plenty.

Now, the Sixaxis-only control might have rung alarm bells for some. There's a reason most games don't use it – it's a ball ache. Before I played Flower I was right there with you. To be honest, as I played it I was there with you for some of the time (mostly as I swung the pad in the faces of the people around me, watching my petals careen all over the screen) but for the most part it's smooth and intuitive.
-1- 2   next >>
Companies:
Games: Flower

Read More Like This


Comments

config 10 Feb 2009 16:23
1/16
"you get to a point that's not unlike de Blob, with colour being added to a broken and graying cityscape as you go."

de-bloody-Blob?

It's an idea that's been around since Wizball on the C64, dammit. Which makes this some sort of Wizball/Katamari offspring

deBlob. FFS.

robot bastard 11 Feb 2009 21:58
2/16
“This looks like the game equivalent of a Murakami novel – long, soporific and slow.”
please think before you post things like this as it is painfully not true murakami is a fantastic writer and far form soporific

yes im a gamer and a seasoned reader
more comments below our sponsor's message
SPInGSPOnG 12 Feb 2009 08:05
3/16
robot bastard wrote:
please think before you post things like this as it is painfully not true murakami is a fantastic writer and far form soporific

yes im a gamer and a seasoned reader

I like the fact that you have posted to wave your literary credentials, but you are unable to manage basic grammar, punctuation and spelling.

My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book.


Fluver 12 Feb 2009 09:35
4/16
Hi may be you are interested in the following site named F****t.Do viait the site

Lisa

www.f***r.com

[12 Feb 2009, 09:52: Message edited by 'config' - unlikely. In future, please pay for your Valentine's spam]
Disappointed Lover 12 Feb 2009 10:27
5/16
Fluver wrote:
Hi may be you are interested in the following site named F****t.Do viait the site
[12 Feb 2009, 09:52: Message edited by 'config' - unlikely. In future, please pay for your Valentine's spam]


Hold on I was interested in what Lisa had to say you fascists!! Now what do I do for Valentine's Day? I suppose I'll have to read "Supûtoniku no koibito" again. Zzzzz.
micta 12 Feb 2009 15:19
6/16
Rod Todd wrote:


My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book.




You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.
robot bastard 12 Feb 2009 19:41
7/16

"I like the fact that you have posted to wave your literary credentials, but you are unable to manage basic grammar, punctuation and spelling.

My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book."
no just no
i was very tired when i posted that and i refuse to apoligise for my poor english
however i truly do enjoy murakami's books and those by many others
Harry Black 12 Feb 2009 22:02
8/16
micta wrote:
You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.

If you don't really enjoy reading him. Don't read him.

If you do really enjoy reading him, then there's the real joy. What's so, like, mindblowing?
sue_raas 13 Feb 2009 00:45
9/16
Harry Black wrote:
micta wrote:
You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.

If you don't really enjoy reading him. Don't read him.

If you do really enjoy reading him, then there's the real joy. What's so, like, mindblowing?


I think the poster is inferring that there is little to no joy in Selbys stories, not even for characters who commit murder just to see what it feels like, or keep a cop tied up in the garage like a dog. Or any other 'bad' behaviour you might find in his books. Part of the thrill (not joy, note) of reading Selby is the 'what comes next?' factor. Just when you think he's plummed the depths of his characters deviant behaviour, off he goes again.

And i bet Harry Blacks not your real name, you cheeky scamp!
TimSpong 13 Feb 2009 15:10
10/16
How on earth did we end up with a Selby vs Murakami deathmatch!

Brilliant!

My money is on Murakami - his long distance running will give him a stamina edge over the less healthy Junior. That said, Hubert is a nasty, street fighter.

Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

FIGHT!
MK vs Literature Universe 13 Feb 2009 15:14
11/16
Tim Smith wrote:
How on earth did we end up with a Selby vs Murakami deathmatch!

screw kafka. you want to have Mary (Chun Li) Shelley in there to kick soem serious butt Frankenstein stylee!

Tim Smith wrote:
FIGHT!


FINISH HIM!
DoctorDee 13 Feb 2009 20:33
12/16
Tim Smith wrote:
Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.

OptimusP 16 Feb 2009 10:33
13/16
DoctorDee wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.


I believe Sun Tzu's "Art of War" and Machiavelli's "De Re Militari" could challenge that, especially with bussiness people, oh, and the Koran!
TimSpong 16 Feb 2009 10:43
14/16
DoctorDee wrote:
In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.


Wrong. I've read The Trial and (The) Metamorphosis. The undisputed champeen is James Joyce. Hands-down, no question. Sitting further down the league table would be Salman Rushdie and Stephen Hawking.

Cheers

Tim
DoctorDee 16 Feb 2009 10:55
15/16
Tim Smith wrote:
Wrong. I've read The Trial and (The) Metamorphosis. The undisputed champeen is James Joyce. Hands-down, no question.

Proves nothing. You've also read Joyce.

No one carries round those other Authors you mentioned, but which ihave already forgotten the names of.

TimSpong 16 Feb 2009 11:05
16/16
DoctorDee wrote:
No one carries round those other Authors you mentioned, but which ihave already forgotten the names of.


Okay then... games in the same vein? GTA IV. Yeah, I said it. "Ooooh, it's a classic. Changed the face of gaming. Superb narrative. It's all about choices".

B******s.

Tim

PS: Stephen Hawking was that bloke from Futurama and Star Trek TNG.

Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.