Reviews// Flower

...when your brain's trying to pound its way through your eardrums

Posted 9 Feb 2009 16:01 by
Companies:
Games: Flower
Frankly, it was really refreshing to play something so simple and intuitive. There's no tutorial in Flower – it doesn't need one. The instructions literally extend to an animation showing you to tilt the controller and the suggestion that you hold a button. That minimalism extends to the rest of the game, too. No introductions, almost no text, just a level-entry screen that consists of Flowers in pots inside a sparse apartment and the levels themselves.

As I said, there's no story. There's a narrative of sorts – as you play through you get ever closer to an urban landscape that is enriched and enlivened by your actions until you get to a point that's not unlike de Blob, with colour being added to a broken and graying cityscape as you go.

Fundamentally, though, the game is an exercise in breezily transporting you across a beautiful landscape and chilling you the Ommm out. It looks superb, with rich and varied landscapes. It sounds great, with a lush, rich score. At the risk of whipping out a contradiction, it's Zen in the extreme.

So yes – you might describe Flower as a sissy-boy game – it's about as far as you could ever hope to get on a games console from the testosterone-fuelled likes of Killzone 2 or Gears of War.

It's kind of like Sonic the Flower as you flow through the landscape, taking in as many items (Flower petals) as you can.

If you want to be a bit poncy, the pacing and feeling of calm you get playing through Flower isn't dissimilar from a Murakami novel.

And if anything's going to prove a system-seller of PS3s to hippies, it's Flower.

For me, what Flower really is is a hangover game. Perfect for Sunday mornings when your brain's trying to pound its way through your eardrums. Just sit down and feel waves of serenity wash over you. You'll look like Bill Bailey after he swallowed The Little Book of Calm in no time...

If there's a complaint to be made against Flower, it's that it's a bit insubstantial. I played through it in something like two hours - and I took the scenic route. After paying £6.29, you might not feel like you've got too much bang for your buck.


SPOnG Score: 86%

Flower is a well-crafted, relaxing break from the stomach-swilling speeds of many contemporary games. Playing it is somewhat akin to sitting in a warm bath and smoking a quarter of the green stuff. It's let down only by its brevity. Like the life of a grasshopper or something. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to write a haiku...
<< prev    1 -2-
Companies:
Games: Flower

Read More Like This


Comments

config 10 Feb 2009 16:23
1/16
"you get to a point that's not unlike de Blob, with colour being added to a broken and graying cityscape as you go."

de-bloody-Blob?

It's an idea that's been around since Wizball on the C64, dammit. Which makes this some sort of Wizball/Katamari offspring

deBlob. FFS.

robot bastard 11 Feb 2009 21:58
2/16
“This looks like the game equivalent of a Murakami novel – long, soporific and slow.”
please think before you post things like this as it is painfully not true murakami is a fantastic writer and far form soporific

yes im a gamer and a seasoned reader
more comments below our sponsor's message
SPInGSPOnG 12 Feb 2009 08:05
3/16
robot bastard wrote:
please think before you post things like this as it is painfully not true murakami is a fantastic writer and far form soporific

yes im a gamer and a seasoned reader

I like the fact that you have posted to wave your literary credentials, but you are unable to manage basic grammar, punctuation and spelling.

My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book.


Fluver 12 Feb 2009 09:35
4/16
Hi may be you are interested in the following site named F****t.Do viait the site

Lisa

www.f***r.com

[12 Feb 2009, 09:52: Message edited by 'config' - unlikely. In future, please pay for your Valentine's spam]
Disappointed Lover 12 Feb 2009 10:27
5/16
Fluver wrote:
Hi may be you are interested in the following site named F****t.Do viait the site
[12 Feb 2009, 09:52: Message edited by 'config' - unlikely. In future, please pay for your Valentine's spam]


Hold on I was interested in what Lisa had to say you fascists!! Now what do I do for Valentine's Day? I suppose I'll have to read "Supûtoniku no koibito" again. Zzzzz.
micta 12 Feb 2009 15:19
6/16
Rod Todd wrote:


My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book.




You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.
robot bastard 12 Feb 2009 19:41
7/16

"I like the fact that you have posted to wave your literary credentials, but you are unable to manage basic grammar, punctuation and spelling.

My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book."
no just no
i was very tired when i posted that and i refuse to apoligise for my poor english
however i truly do enjoy murakami's books and those by many others
Harry Black 12 Feb 2009 22:02
8/16
micta wrote:
You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.

If you don't really enjoy reading him. Don't read him.

If you do really enjoy reading him, then there's the real joy. What's so, like, mindblowing?
sue_raas 13 Feb 2009 00:45
9/16
Harry Black wrote:
micta wrote:
You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.

If you don't really enjoy reading him. Don't read him.

If you do really enjoy reading him, then there's the real joy. What's so, like, mindblowing?


I think the poster is inferring that there is little to no joy in Selbys stories, not even for characters who commit murder just to see what it feels like, or keep a cop tied up in the garage like a dog. Or any other 'bad' behaviour you might find in his books. Part of the thrill (not joy, note) of reading Selby is the 'what comes next?' factor. Just when you think he's plummed the depths of his characters deviant behaviour, off he goes again.

And i bet Harry Blacks not your real name, you cheeky scamp!
TimSpong 13 Feb 2009 15:10
10/16
How on earth did we end up with a Selby vs Murakami deathmatch!

Brilliant!

My money is on Murakami - his long distance running will give him a stamina edge over the less healthy Junior. That said, Hubert is a nasty, street fighter.

Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

FIGHT!
MK vs Literature Universe 13 Feb 2009 15:14
11/16
Tim Smith wrote:
How on earth did we end up with a Selby vs Murakami deathmatch!

screw kafka. you want to have Mary (Chun Li) Shelley in there to kick soem serious butt Frankenstein stylee!

Tim Smith wrote:
FIGHT!


FINISH HIM!
DoctorDee 13 Feb 2009 20:33
12/16
Tim Smith wrote:
Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.

OptimusP 16 Feb 2009 10:33
13/16
DoctorDee wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.


I believe Sun Tzu's "Art of War" and Machiavelli's "De Re Militari" could challenge that, especially with bussiness people, oh, and the Koran!
TimSpong 16 Feb 2009 10:43
14/16
DoctorDee wrote:
In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.


Wrong. I've read The Trial and (The) Metamorphosis. The undisputed champeen is James Joyce. Hands-down, no question. Sitting further down the league table would be Salman Rushdie and Stephen Hawking.

Cheers

Tim
DoctorDee 16 Feb 2009 10:55
15/16
Tim Smith wrote:
Wrong. I've read The Trial and (The) Metamorphosis. The undisputed champeen is James Joyce. Hands-down, no question.

Proves nothing. You've also read Joyce.

No one carries round those other Authors you mentioned, but which ihave already forgotten the names of.

TimSpong 16 Feb 2009 11:05
16/16
DoctorDee wrote:
No one carries round those other Authors you mentioned, but which ihave already forgotten the names of.


Okay then... games in the same vein? GTA IV. Yeah, I said it. "Ooooh, it's a classic. Changed the face of gaming. Superb narrative. It's all about choices".

B******s.

Tim

PS: Stephen Hawking was that bloke from Futurama and Star Trek TNG.

Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.