Previews// Uncharted: Drake's Fortune

Posted 9 Nov 2007 18:10 by
Quick plot overview (as far as the preview code takes us at least): a likeable Yankee rogue (Nathan Drake) discovers Elizabethan explorer, Sir Francis Drake’s, lost diary with a page ripped out. That page contains a (or is it ‘the’) map to El Dorado - the lost city of gold, not the failed BBC soap opera. Said loveable rogue is accompanied by a lovely, spunky/fiesty documentary film-maker – Elena Fisher - (there is, of course, sexual tension) who films the entire finding-the-diary escapade. She, you see, has an agenda.

Oh, despite Sir Francis Drake having died without issue (he’d spent a great deal of time at sea), aforementioned rogue is – apparently – part of the family. Thickening of plot – as is the ring tied around his neck.

Nat’ is also partnered with a father-figure (Sully, I’m not sure if that’s his first or last name but I do no that it’s a verb meaning ‘to dirty’). Sully has no time for lovely documentary film makers.

To be honest, Sully has no time for much of anything save for treasure!

Okay, any more plot and we’re into spoilers so… quickly now:

Find diary – need page – seek page – fire guns – jump on things – jump between things – fire more guns – solve puzzles – fire more guns – have a bit of a shock – develop more motivation – jump / fire / solve. Do all this in a third-person format.

You get the idea, I’m sure. But now you’re going to say something like, “But I heard it was just Tomb Raider for chicks or for blokes who like looking at other blokes!”

Well, shut up. Yes, just, Mmmm, shut up.

For a start I have it on good authority that “chicks” (as you so sexistly put it), liked Tomb Raider. In fact Ms Croft was a major influence on the Spice Girls-lead, Girrrl Power revolution that so changed all our lives.

Secondly, Nathan Drake’s dashing good looks, roguish charm, strangely strangulated morals and ability to talk to himself at odd moments… actually stop right there. Yes, he does talk to himself… if he’s about to crouch, roll and take a shot via the really quite easy to use control system, he’ll bloody talk to himself. For me – I don’t like FPSs with all their pretence that you’re the character – that actually helped the game-play along.

Where was I? Oh yes, the Tomb Raider comparisons. Look, sure, if that’s what you want to do then fine. Frankly because there are jumping, shooting, puzzle solving and searching, sure… why not make the comparison. It won’t get you anywhere – I mean Family Guy and The Simpsons both have roughly similar constituent factors, but they both make me laugh. Get over it… move on.

So, Tim, how does the bleeder play? Well, I enjoyed it. The control system works logically and efficiently (this is a preview not a sodding manual, so I’m not going into the detail). By this I mean no combination of buttons, no [L1] or [R2] pressing interfered with my general (and I must say) great enjoyment of hacking through jungle, leaping off and on things or targeting my mighty weapon(s). In short, it all just worked.
<< prev    1 -2- 3   next >>

Read More Like This


Comments

Ed Itter 9 Nov 2007 21:55
1/12
there has quite clearly been a cut and paste disaster of some considerable magnitude on page three of this otherwise enformative and intertwining preview. eral vision onwards.
TimSpong 9 Nov 2007 23:08
2/12
Ed Itter wrote:
there has quite clearly been a cut and paste disaster of some considerable magnitude on page three of this otherwise enformative and intertwining preview. eral vision onwards.


Thanks for pointing that out... it's been dealt with.

regards

Tim


more comments below our sponsor's message
pUDGE 10 Nov 2007 04:24
3/12
k.. I DONT KNOW what version u played.. I played the north american demo.. like an hour ago.. and well.. ITS awsome.. I kept stoping and looking at stuff. graphics are great.. my only complaint is u cant duck.. u can duck behind things and against things.. just not when your running. THE GAME ROCKS>. Manu uare picky.. go buy an xbox
actionmonkey 12 Nov 2007 10:09
4/12
Who ever wrote this preview should have spent more time learning basic grammer and spelling than trying to sound like a 'geezer' down the pub. It sounds like it was written by somebody who didn't give a toss and as a result I don't trust it.




EH 12 Nov 2007 11:18
5/12
This "preview" is a garbled nonsense - I'd guess that some alcohol was involved in its creation.
TimSpong 12 Nov 2007 11:27
6/12
pUDGE wrote:
k.. I DONT KNOW what version u played.. I played the north american demo.. like an hour ago.. and well.. ITS awsome.. I kept stoping and looking at stuff. graphics are great.. my only complaint is u cant duck.. u can duck behind things and against things.. just not when your running. THE GAME ROCKS>. Manu uare picky.. go buy an xbox


I played the version that Sony sent me to play.

At no point did I say that it wasn't good. However, as I've not played the full game yet I am not going to say that "It rocks" or "It is awesome" or any other hyperbolic nonsense. A great deal can happen between preview and release.

It would be very much like basing a film/movie review on the "Coming Soon Trailers", but if that's your thing...

Yes, I am picky... and I've got enough Xboxes to play with, thanks.

Good point re the ducking...

Cheers

Tim
TimSpong 12 Nov 2007 11:48
7/12
actionmonkey wrote:
Who ever wrote this preview should have spent more time learning basic grammer and spelling than trying to sound like a 'geezer' down the pub. It sounds like it was written by somebody who didn't give a toss and as a result I don't trust it.


I wrote it. I do give a toss.

Mate, if you're going to use a phrase like "I don't trust" regarding my previews AND if you're going to make derogatory comments about spelling and grammar...

...then at least spell 'grammar' correctly.

Also, it doesn't "sound like", it "reads like" - unless you are reading the words out loud to yourself, in which case you would be making the sounds using your own intonations and I can't be blamed for those.

English, it's a strange mistress and a right bitch.

Cheers

Tim




TimSpong 12 Nov 2007 11:51
8/12
EH wrote:
This "preview" is a garbled nonsense - I'd guess that some alcohol was involved in its creation.


Ho-hum,

You would guess wrong. I only start drinking heavily after I've read the Forum each day.

I will have a large Jamesons over ice please.

By the way, an idea of why you think it is garbled nonsense would at least be constructive.

Tim
hollywooda 20 Nov 2007 12:43
9/12
when i can afford a PS3?..... i quite like the look of this one.
arthur_storey 13 Feb 2008 09:32
10/12
i was going to investigate this game further but after reading this mess of a review i don't think i'll bother and i will wait for the next tomb raider game. i am a long time reader and an infrequent poster but i have to say that since late last year your sites been a bit of a mess and most of it is because of ho hum boring industry news and reviews like this one. Why not tell us about exciting games that are coming out sooN? No more boring statistics and no more badly written reviews please.
Prue Frida 13 Feb 2008 17:14
11/12

This is unreadable garbage. How can you possibly convey the flavour of this game with a crappy review like this? Lucky for we interested customers that there are reveiws elsewhere that offer a better oversight of the game and don't try to spunk out some Loaded magazine style rubbish that says more about the writers probably altered state of mind than the game
plsreadme 14 Feb 2008 01:12
12/12
It's not review - it's a preview. duh
Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.