World Exclusive: How Nintendo escaped the case that might see Sony pay Microsoft for every PlayStation product sold

> News Comments > SPOnG Comments Index

Topic started: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:18
Click here to view the news article this topic refers to.
Page:«123456
ozfunghi
Joined 18 Oct 2004
283 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:18
"April Fools" or "Days of Our Lives"?

Anyway, interesing if true. And indeed, the force feedback in Nintendo's controllers does work in a different way.
DoctorDee
Joined 3 Sep 1999
2130 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:41
ozfunghi wrote:
"April Fools" or "Days of Our Lives"?

Anyway, interesing if true. And indeed, the force feedback in Nintendo's controllers does work in a different way.


It's a bit late in the day for an April Fool. Plus, we already did our Google skin!

If the quotes weren't real, we'd get sued. And the legal stuff is out there in the public domain if you go lok for it.

As for "Days of our Lives" reference, that was a "woooosh" for me!
TigerUppercut
Joined 28 Jun 2000
799 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 17:54
ozfunghi wrote:
"April Fools" or "Days of Our Lives"?

Anyway, interesing if true. And indeed, the force feedback in Nintendo's controllers does work in a different way.

No, it's not an AFD gag. This is part of the reason for SPOnG's rather small news output over the past few days.

Xbox 360: Downloadable Demos From Day One, Wireless and more

And

Xbox pull confirmed at retail and by publishers

didn't help either. You are spoilt here
neocarrillo
Joined 31 Mar 2005
156 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 18:09
Well the evil empire microsoft has a 10% stake in immersion, well here's my theory. I believe sony will rather pull the ps2 line form us shores than have to pay microsoft. Microsoft is so desprat to beat sony that if they can't bet them in sales then they will profit from them instead. Well this little bullshit strategy will come to bite microsoft in the ass.
Hear me out, if the ps2 line is pulled, what microsoft is gonna cause is an early death of their next system. Do you realise how many people will be pissed that ps2 is no longer on their store shelves. There will be so many people waiting for ps3 to come out and by sony pulling the ps2 line off, they can manufacture more ps3's for launch. I bet the next dual shock will not have immersions technology, so immersion will be f**ked.
So by microsoft and immersion doing this it wont hurt sony much anyway because there are 35 million people in the usa that have ps2 and xbox wont top that, especially since the new xbox comes out this fall. So when the playstation 3 comes out with a new revolutionary dual shock controler, sony will blow everyone out the water.
All immersion and microsoft are doing is causing more anticipation for the PlayStation 3.
Coxy
Joined 1 Sep 2004
203 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:18
i agree wth u neocarrillo, i would rather sony pull the ps2 than pay microsoft,( its inevitable that sony would stop ps2 production evebtually anyway) this would create more anticipation for ps3.
neocarrillo
Joined 31 Mar 2005
156 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:25
yeah man finally a sony fan in the house. I love sony and the playstation, what do you think of the psp.
kid_77
Joined 29 Nov 2004
875 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:59
mac wrote:
i agree wth u neocarrillo, i would rather sony pull the ps2 than pay microsoft,( its inevitable that sony would stop ps2 production evebtually anyway) this would create more anticipation for ps3.


I think it's highly unlikely Sony would pull PS2 just to spite M$, months before PS3 is released; the Playstation brand is too important to them. But say it did happen, I'm not sure consumers would wait specifically for the next PS. Remember, the Xbox Next is supposed to be coming out before PS3 and when M$ ram it down our throats though promotions and marketing, and see EA's line-up of sports titles (mistaking the fancy cut-scene graphics for in-game - a la the current hyped Yank Footy shots) it will VERY tempting.

I think Sony HAVE to keep with PS2 until PS3 comes along, even if it means filling M$'s coffers in the mean time (in which time they can develop a new rumble technology that doesn't require dual motors in unison ;))

Sony have got to keep the momentum of the PS brand going.
Coxy
Joined 1 Sep 2004
203 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:15
sony does have some hope of avoiding paying microsoft, i think were forgeting sonys latest piece of hardware that has no dual shock controllers - the psp, if sony milk the psp for all its worth they will make a fair amount of money.

(In response to neocarillo the psp rocks and i will definatly be getting one!)
saurian
Joined 4 Aug 2004
64 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:41
mac wrote:
sony does have some hope of avoiding paying microsoft, i think were forgeting sonys latest piece of hardware that has no dual shock controllers - the psp, if sony milk the psp for all its worth they will make a fair amount of money.

Sony will no doubt milk the PSP for all its worth !!

The point everyone seems to be missing is that both Sony AND Microsoft were originally being sued for patent infringement. Microsoft paid up and Sony did not. Whether the infringement was correct or not, I have no idea. But the two companies dealt with it in different ways. Probably its just that as Microsoft is awash with money, they did not have to worry either way.Sony just ignored it. Microsoft has not just bought this 10% stake, they settled months ago. It was reported on the very pages. If Sony were not so complacent, they would have seen this coming.

I hope Sony do manage to sort themselves out, but not because I 'Love ' them like some of you, but because one company having a monopoly with anything is bad. Sony proved this because as soon as they saw off Sega and were not really challenged by Ninty, they stopped trying to improve and never moved forward. The PS2 is nowhere near as good as Xbox. This is a fact. The Xbox live service has NO competition. Sony did not think it worth bothering.They are far behind with their next console. They have been wrong footed by Microsoft. Xbox 360 out this year. PS3 ?? No idea. Probably out at same time as Xbox3 !!



(In response to neocarillo the psp rocks and i will definatly be getting one!)


By the way. I think PSP looks awesome as well.
Coxy
Joined 1 Sep 2004
203 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:58
ps3 is slated for a 2006 realease, not long after xbox 2, by which time everone who would want an xbox2 would have had one and interest would have slowed down and playstation sales would increase.

three companies are working on the cell processor that will power ps3 as opposed to microsoft who r making it on their own (not that im saying that will make it good)
Coxy
Joined 1 Sep 2004
203 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 21:18
sorry for saying xbox 2 i meant xbox360 (sorry, but its the worst name ever)
neocarrillo
Joined 31 Mar 2005
156 comments
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:01
Yeah xbox 360 is the worst name but sony has the coolest names PlayStation 2 or 3 and PSP. Check it out guys. When the Playstation 3 hits everyone is gonna go bannanas. It will knock xbox 360 on it's ass.

1. Backwards compatible - You can play ps1, ps2 and ps3 games.

2. DVD - We will still play our dvd's and the new blu-ray dvd's.

3. PSP connection - If you own a psp you can connect wirelessly and you can put your memory sticks in the ps3.

4. Best games - nintendo may have mario, donkey kong, zelda and kirby and microsoft has halo (I would metion other games but there are none lol). Playstation on the other gets everything the other 2 companies get and a bunch of exclusives. What I mean by exclusives are games like devil may cry, final fantasy, gran turismo and grand theft auto. Now it is true xbox did get gta 3, vice city and san andreas but look how long they had to wait. By the time they get it everyone has
already talked about it and played the s**t out of it.

5. Better graphics - now the problem with the ps2 that every hater attacks is the graphics. It's true xbox and gamecube are better looking graphically. But you have to understand that when ps2 was being made the only next generation console out was dreamcast. So sony didn't know the specs of gamecube or xbox, sony would have smoked them if they knew though.
So with the ps3 we get nvidia to make the graphics chip and we know what wonders they did for xbox. I feel microsoft was stupid for letting them go. Not only are they better than ATI but are also more innovative. Look at pc's graphics, nvidia was the first to come out with pci express and now they are the first with SLI - dual graphics cards, mean while ATI was blown away cause nvidia was giving better graphics and more performance for a cheaper price than ATI.

6. Better online connectivity - Now microsoft has xbox live which is better set up than ps2's online service, but you know what, at least when we buy a ps2 we can go online and play whatever we want and not have to pay anyone other then our ISP's, with xbox you have to pay 40 bucks for only a year when it should be a lifetime. So with ps3 we will get a better service for free where im sure we will be able to download cars for gt4 and play multiplayer gta and download movies and music for our psp's. I'm excited.

I could go on but this has reached a long essay, I hope this was helpful for all the playstation owners in this forum.

Pilot13
Joined 2 Feb 2005
231 comments
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 00:44
I haven't posted anything in a while, but most of these comments were interesting. If sony does pull the PS2, it could do either extreme. It could be that everyone just wants the PS3 more. Of course Sony would have to redesign their controller around a new rumble system, may destroy some of the iconography of the playstation, but personally, i've never really gotten used to the playstation controller, just doesn't sit right in my hands. Of course it could as easily hit the other extreme, because there is no playstation branding out there people lose any loyalty they had for the system and start to look at it objectivly 'why do i still have this when that console can play most of the same games, but new ones are still being made etc.' Keeping your brand alive in the customer's minds is very important, hence why McDonald's and Coke spend millions every year in advertising despite the mcdonalds arches being more universally recognised than the cross and a lot of fuss over Coke being sold in Somalia.

I very much doubt sony would pull it, I remember reading somewhere, correct me if i'm wrong, that some time ago the PS2 was the only thing making Sony any profit, what with them being a bit slow to make plasma screens and dvd players (the ps2 sold in japan originally as a cheap dvd player) a little cheaper than everyone else. Something they've fixed now, but the playstation is way too important for them.
piyo
Joined 11 Nov 2004
2 comments
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 00:50
Does this legal action in the U.S. have anything to do with Sony cancelling a press conference about the PS3 in Japan?
saurian
Joined 4 Aug 2004
64 comments
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 07:54
neocarrillo wrote:
Yeah xbox 360 is the worst name but sony has the coolest names PlayStation 2 or 3 and PSP. Check it out guys. When the Playstation 3 hits everyone is gonna go bannanas. It will knock xbox 360 on it's ass.

I agree, Playstation is a good name. But you can only fool people for so long. They will gradually realise that it does not mean 'best' just ' a console by Sony'

1. Backwards compatible - You can play ps1, ps2 and ps3 games.

Why would you want to play PS1 and PS2 games on it. Dont you have a PS2?

2. DVD - We will still play our dvd's and the new blu-ray dvd's.

I am from England - There are no Blu Ray DVD's here.

3. PSP connection - If you own a psp you can connect wirelessly and you can put your memory sticks in the ps3.

Hope this is not Nintendo patent infringement!!

4. Best games - nintendo may have mario, donkey kong, zelda and kirby and microsoft has halo (I would metion other games but there are none lol). Playstation on the other gets everything the other 2 companies get and a bunch of exclusives. What I mean by exclusives are games like devil may cry, final fantasy, gran turismo and grand theft auto. Now it is true xbox did get gta 3, vice city and san andreas but look how long they had to wait. By the time they get it everyone has
already talked about it and played the s**t out of it.

The person who made Final Fantasy has signed a contract with Microsoft to produce his next two RPG's exclusively for 360. GTA3, I agree was very late, but although the game was good, having PS2 graphics on Xbox was such a let down. I do agree however that PS2 gets all the rest of the games. This is only because it has sold more, so therefore should all these users should mean more game sales. In the next generation, because Microsoft ewill have a much larger chunk of the market, this will automatically change. Look at all the games announced for 360. None so far for PS3, but thats probably because its so far off.

5. Better graphics - now the problem with the ps2 that every hater attacks is the graphics. It's true xbox and gamecube are better looking graphically. But you have to understand that when ps2 was being made the only next generation console out was dreamcast. So sony didn't know the specs of gamecube or xbox, sony would have smoked them if they knew though.
So you think they deliberately made PS2 like that but could have made it better?
So with the ps3 we get nvidia to make the graphics chip and we know what wonders they did for xbox. I feel microsoft was stupid for letting them go. Not only are they better than ATI but are also more innovative. Look at pc's graphics, nvidia was the first to come out with pci express and now they are the first with SLI - dual graphics cards, mean while ATI was blown away cause nvidia was giving better graphics and more performance for a cheaper price than ATI.

I hope both companies products are very close in what they can do. This will spur them both to improve. This in turn will give us, the consumers better consoles and games.

6. Better online connectivity - Now microsoft has xbox live which is better set up than ps2's online service, but you know what, at least when we buy a ps2 we can go online and play whatever we want and not have to pay anyone other then our ISP's, with xbox you have to pay 40 bucks for only a year when it should be a lifetime. So with ps3 we will get a better service for free where im sure we will be able to download cars for gt4 and play multiplayer gta and download movies and music for our psp's. I'm excited.

Don't think you will be able to download cars for GT4, its for PS2. Maybe GT5 or GT6. This will bring Playstation ownwers up to where Xbox 1 ownwers are now- downloads. You dont know what you are missing. And, if your live service is copied from Microsoft as well, you really do have something to feel good about.

I could go on but this has reached a long essay, I hope this was helpful for all the playstation owners in this forum.



Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.