The European Union wants to extend its current Sales and Guarantees Directive to cover video games and other software. In short, the EU games makers to provide a two-year guarantee against bug or glitched software.
Responding to this, the head of Tiga, Dr Richard Wilson, states:
"If there is an onus on developers to have software that is 'near perfect' then it could stifle new ideas as people could end up just playing it safe.
"Consumers need good quality products - that is only reasonable - but if the legislation is too heavy-handed it could make publishers and developers very cautious."
Pithy, but not as funny as the Business Software Alliance, director of public policy, Francisco Mingorance, who told the BBC, "Digital content is not a tangible good and should not be subject to the same liability rules as toasters. It is contractually licensed to consumers and not sold."
Another objection to the proposal is, strangely, that a piece of software could be designed over a few years for platforms that might not even exist... or as Dr Wilson puts it, "Games takes years to develop and software teams often have to predict what new technology will be in place when the game is actually finished."
We think he also could have elicited a little more public support, with, "If there is an onus on developers to have software that is 'near perfect' then it could stifle new ideas as people could end up just playing it safe."
What do you think? Would a standard two-year guarantee on non-bugged games stifle imagination or encourage decent coding over rapid marketing? Tell us in the Forum.
Source