Hillary Clinton wants in on hot, steamy sex

Absolutely love the title.

This may be one of the funniest articles on Spong...lol!


Anyways, why is she so concerned about this, aren't they're more important things to do in D.C.?

Absolutely. It's one (quite acceptable) thing to depict rape, murder and violence... but showing adults performing a consensual natural act required for the copntinutation of the human race is UNACCEPTABLE AND MUST BE STOPPED.

I guess Hillary worked out (like Tony 'B' Liar) that the only way to beat 'em is to join em.

Guns-violence-drug use is ok but show sex and there are calling to ban the game and its not even an official mod. Shows whats wrong with the world

Totally agree with Ron and Finian.

Perhaps we should all chip in and buy Ms Clinton a copy to sample for herself. She's hung up on sex because she probably couldn't satisfy her after her nice guy hubby Bill
got caught out by the miracle of DNA.

Yes it's Mr Clinton's relish on the dress. Perhaps Ms Clinton wants it on her dress though. LOL.

Sex is natural and creates life and guns and violence take it away. I'm not surprised by thier stupid double standard bs. I hope she does get a chance to confront Rockstar because only then will she find out how stupid her and others arguement is.

I think you all are overreacting a little bit. Most likely, nothing will come of this, not because of it being a mod, but because I have serious doubts to whether Ms. Clinton CARES about this at all.

As we Americans (should) well know, the presidental nomination process is in upswing once again, believe it or not. Ms. Clinton needs to start some sort of action, regardless if successful or not, that panders to the moderates and right, in order to try to diminish the perception of her being a "left-wing extremist."

Doing something stupid like this won't be successful, but it may help her get more votes, and give her something to say when she wants to appear "pro family."

In the end, therefore, it is just a silly publicity stunt. nothing mroe.

sorry about the huge amount of text.

"Sex is natural and creates life"

Yes, but does that mean I can show it whenever I want to wherever I want to.

Sex is the pinnacle of human interaction and should be saved for only one person, sadly this isn't the case for a lot of people.

Sex is a highly emotional thing, that is why it is rated higher than violence, yes violence is emotional, but sex is a sacred thing (and sadly some people think we're just animals, and let's do it anyway)

___

You guys are right, Hillary Clinton is just doing a publicity stunt.

Isn't rape, sex??

And how is Tony B a liar?

There was this war, right? And we went out on a promise of guaranteed threat from WMDs. And there were none.
See? He lied.

The problem with that argument is that everyone thought there were WMDs there. The fact that there weren't doesn't make him a liar. That's like someone asking you where to get a specific video game, saying "store X sells video games, try that one" and the person finds that they don't have that specific game for some reason. It doesn't make you a liar, just ill-informed.

Granted, the WMD issue was silly to begin with (they lacked delivery systems to send them anywhere too important, so it wasn't that great a threat) but that doesn't mean he lied.

I don't know if they have it over in the UK (probably don't) but if you can get your hands on "The Chappelle Show," Dave Chappelle does a great skit on what America would be like with "Black Bush" and how no one would trust him. It's hilarious.

And to keep this on topic -- um, Hillary doesn't understand videogames.

Nope. Not everyone thought there were WMDs in Iraq. In fact, I believe UN weapons inspector Hans Blix was rather vocally against any military action, saying his team needed more time to confirm the presence of WMDs.

The US government wanted everyone to believe there were WMDs, and managed to rope the UK into the war. Other nations had the good sense to wait and see what the Blix would come up with, and stay the fsck out of Iraq until there was evidence.

Now, I personally don't believe that Bush persuaded Blair that Iraq needed a stern kicking on the basis of WMDs or Saddam's humanitarian record. Forget thinking of the children; think of the oil, the contracts for rebuilding the infrastructure - think of the money!

So while Tony B can hide behind half-cooked weapons inspector reports and "intelligence" from allied goverment agencies, it's my opinion that he knew full bloody well that the presence of WMDs in Iraq was very, very far from a certainty. To then go to the people and say otherwise make him a liar. And a cnut.