It appears that ASDA - which is owned by everybody's favourite American stores, Wal-Mart - has owned up to selling video games at a loss. The company's games buying manager, Duncan Cross, told
GI:
"It might surprise Chips MD Don McCabe and others, but we aren’t making any money on
FIFA 10 because the price we have had to pay to the supplier is more than we are charging our customers."
Therefore ASDA is paying EA
more than £38.91 for the game.
Cross then makes the kind of argument regarding under-cutting the competition based on being able to use loss-leaders that would probably please a shareholder but not fool a child: "I am sure the other supermarkets are in a similar boat, so to criticise them as 'bully boys' doesn’t make sense to me – how can you be a bully if you are selling something for less than you buy it at?"
He then supports the uncompetitive practice via the use of the sacred customer: "Our customers continue to tell us that computer games are an expensive product in today's economic climate so we are working hard to try and offer them consistently good value for money within the games category."
So, are ASDA and other supermarkets providing excellent value for money? Or will the death of the independent prepared to stock all manner of games (and have the expertise and interest to help its customers) result in the death of innovative but poorly selling titles? A leading question and a biased one, we admit. What do you think? To the Forum please.