Film Maker Boll: Over?

Alone in the Dark maker to go low budget.

Posted by Staff
Uwe Boll: still living the dream.
Uwe Boll: still living the dream.
German film-maker, Uwe Boll, has seen his latest film - the $70-million In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale tank at the box office. When we say 'tank', we don't mean fish-tank, we mean bloody huge, industrial sewage tank: it took $3.3m at the box-office on the critical first weekend.

What does this mean for the man who brought us Alone in the Dark, House of the Dead and the forthcoming Far Cry video game to movie tie-ins?

According to The Hollywood Reporter it means the man will return to low-budget movies. Speaking to Boll, the industry mag was told, "In the future, I will focus on small films such as (the video game adaptation) 'Postal' or (the Vietnam war drama) 'Tunnel Rats'

"These are films that represent my true passion, and they can be done with small budgets."

Thus far Boll was able to use a German tax shelter funds in order to, as the Reporter puts it, 'bankroll' his bigger-budget flicks. Now, however, that scheme has been banned.

This means that Uwe will leave the likes of Ray Liotta, Burt Reynolds, Jason Statham and Ron Perlman - all of whom starred in In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale for less well-know Thespians as he heads for day one of his shoot on Zombie Massacre.

Head over to the aptly-named Boll-kg site for more info on, " DER MEISTER DES TRASH".

Is Uwe underrated? Will his films one day be seen as classics? Do you have the boxset? Tell us in the Forum.

The Hollywood Reporter

Comments

DoctorDee 15 Jan 2008 23:15
1/7
Uwe's movies are festering turds. It is shocking and disappointing that he can get thespians of the calibre of Statham and Eva Padberg (not to mention Reynolds and Liotta) to star in his tedious drivel.

Only in a post, post, post ironic society will his movies ever be considered classics. He is a butt-munch.


Absinthe-Review.net 15 Jan 2008 23:35
2/7
Classics in a horrifying, not-at-all-funny sort of way. What I want to know is why DEVELOPERS are letting this guy handle their franchises!

One of two things is going to happen here: he may find a few shreds of creativity and find some slick ways to improvise Evil Dead style, or...his movies will get even WORSE *shudder*.

Seriously, though..."buttmunch"?
more comments below our sponsor's message
TimSpong 16 Jan 2008 01:21
3/7
The Absinthe Review Network wrote:
Classics in a horrifying, not-at-all-funny sort of way. What I want to know is why DEVELOPERS are letting this guy handle their franchises!


Some people are greedy.

Cheers

Tim
ajmetz 16 Jan 2008 04:59
4/7
Postal represents his true passion!?! =P
OptimusP 16 Jan 2008 09:11
5/7
The Absinthe Review Network wrote:
Classics in a horrifying, not-at-all-funny sort of way. What I want to know is why DEVELOPERS are letting this guy handle their franchises!

Need to fund too expensive and overcomplicated to make next-gen projects somehow.
Absinthe-Review.net 20 Jan 2008 21:51
6/7
Tim Smith wrote:
The Absinthe Review Network wrote:
Classics in a horrifying, not-at-all-funny sort of way. What I want to know is why DEVELOPERS are letting this guy handle their franchises!


Some people are greedy.

Cheers

Tim


Hmm, yes I suppose so. A shame there aren't more directors willing to touch a game franchise, eh? Boll is pretty much the shoe-in Plan B for making movies, when Plan A using Director X falls through...

...ok, maybe Plan D, but the point is a lot of developers seem to turn to the little game-to-movie slut eventually...
daz 21 Jan 2008 13:51
7/7
The Absinthe Review Network wrote:
One of two things is going to happen here: he may find a few shreds of creativity and find some slick ways to improvise Evil Dead style, or...his movies will get even WORSE *shudder*.


he can do worse?
Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.