Sony Decapitates a Goat: Daily Mail Gets Upset

Future Publishing recall entire print run of Official PS2 Magazine

Posted by Staff
Sony Decapitates a Goat: Daily Mail Gets Upset
Just when we thought the advertising mavericks over at Sony Computer Entertainment were getting all conservative and that in their ‘third’ age, they go and cut the head off a live goat and encourage people to eat its innards.

At a launch party in (where else) Athens, Greece, to celebrate the launch of the awesome must-buy PS2 exclusive God Of War II, guests were invited to reach into the innards of a freshly slaughtered goat in order to try a little offal.

An interesting delivery method for canapés, we’ll grant them that.

SPOnG can only presume that it is some sort of Greek tradition to serve up offal in a dead goat, although yesterday’s Mail on Sunday front page headline news didn’t seem to take this view, screaming, “Slaughter: Horror at Sony's depraved promotion stunt with decapitated goat”.

So the Mail on Sunday, unsurprisingly, was up in arms about the PR stunt and reported that guests "threw knives at targets and pulled live snakes from a pit with their bare hands. Topless girls added to the louche atmosphere by dipping grapes into guests’ mouths, while a male model portraying Kratos, the game’s warrior hero, handed out garlands."

Clearly the newspaper’s editor was of the opinion that it was a fairly slow news day and perhaps was not aware of other things going on in the world. Perhaps, for instance, he had missed the fact that there had been a major earthquake in Kent where hundreds of peoples lives were irrevocably damaged.

No, a picture of a dead goat tied into an anti-videogaming piece was of course far more important to him! SPOnG notes that the Mail’s reporter also took the opportunity to detail previous apparent gaming scandals. “PlayStation 2 game Manhunt was banned by High Street stores in the UK after it was linked to the murder of a 14-year-old Leicester boy,” claimed the Daily Mail.

In actual fact, this was not the case. Manhunt was voluntarily taken off the shelves by two retailers due to to their concerns about their own family image.

The images from the party – one of which you can see right here - were due to be published in the next issue of the Official Playstation Magazine 2, due out tomorrow. However, Future Publishing has been forced to recall 80,000 copies of Official PlayStation 2 today which carried more of the controversial images in its news pages.

SPOnG has spoken with the publisher of OPM2 this morning, Matthew Pierce, who didn’t wish to comment about the whole page-removing furore, other than re-iterating the official Future line, which is that, "We appreciate our readers may have found the coverage of Sony's European God of War II press launch distasteful, so we have taken the decision to have the offending images removed from copies destined for the UK newsstand with immediate effect."

When we asked Matt if we could have the entire set of offending pics, to present to our readers for them to make up their own minds about the issue, he politely declined to give them to us.

It appears that around 2000 subscribers copies containing the decapitated goat pictures have already been sent out. If anybody out there has one of these, then please feel free to post scans and comments in the forum below.

Sony, meanwhile, has issued an official apology, claiming that, "It has come to our attention that at the God Of War II launch showcase, an element of the event was of an unsuitable nature. Sony does not condone or sanction any inappropriate behaviour by its staff or sub-contracted staff. We are conducting an internal inquiry into aspects of the event in order to learn from the occurrence and put into place measures to ensure that this does not happen again."

The truly magnificent God of War II was released in the UK last Friday.

It’s one of SPOnG’s games of the year to date. Buy it immediately if you haven’t already. Read our full God of War II review right here.

(UPDATE - you can see SCEE's response to this news right here).
Companies:
Games:

Comments

mrFloppy 30 Apr 2007 09:46
1/19
right, I'm moved to comment.

1) this was beaten up by a tabloid
2) it is deceptively meant to be about a dead animal
3) it is really an excuse for the mail to have justification for getting more boobs in their paper
4) the mail wins - publicity + boobs = profits
Bobble 30 Apr 2007 10:26
2/19
Y'know, I hate the Mail's videogame scare tactics as much as the next gamer, but you've got to admit this agency's attempt at a game content-related launch was in pretty poor taste, and does bugger all to dispell the myth that the industry and products are all about fullfilling the fantasies of violent, sex-starved adolescents. I love God of War and am looking forward to playing the sequel, but all the tits and OTT violence in the original made me a wee bit embarrassed to play it. Why do "adult" games consistantly deal with their adult themes in such an immature way? The launch party is in exactly the same mould. I'm sure if you took a poll and asked fans of God of War if they'd enjoy it just as much without the fountains of blood and the "sex" mini-games, the only ones who would answer "no" would be the kiddies...
more comments below our sponsor's message
zoydwheeler 30 Apr 2007 10:42
3/19
In Ancient Greece they never had PlayStations, yet they regularly slayed goats and whatnot at feasts.

Why shouldn't we do it today? I for one want to see more dead animals used in such ways.

Seriously though, while the PR stunt was childish and in poor taste, the fact that Middle England's favourite Sunday tabloid picked up the story as front page news does a huge amount of harm to non-gamer's perceptions of the videogame industry.

If it was a fashion industry party or a music industry party, this would not have been front page news. I would be surprised if it would even be worthy of a two-paragraph mention deep in the paper.

It's just a sad reality that the games industry has to police itself more carefully than other industries, as the non-gaming moral minority that read and believe the Daily Mail are out for our blood. Ironically.
Guppie 30 Apr 2007 10:44
4/19
"Clearly the newspaper’s editor was of the opinion that it was a fairly slow news day and perhaps was not aware of other things going on in the world. Perhaps, for instance, he had missed the fact that there had been a major earthquake in Kent where hundreds of peoples lives were irrevocably damaged."

"Irrevocably damaged" "major"? By an earthquake that lasted under 5 seconds and killed no one? I think a story exposing how one of the biggest companies in the world is setting the example that it's ok to decapitate animals to publicise one of their products is a bit bigger than an earthquake that happened earlier this week and has already been covered extensively...
mrFloppy 30 Apr 2007 10:59
5/19
but it was a pre-dead goat; and as someone here has mentioned, probably treated a bit more humanely than other goats that day because it had to be ready for a party.

/me smells the smell of fear of realising where food comes from
Jack Wallington 30 Apr 2007 11:06
6/19
While the Daily Mail may have written about it poorly, I do think having a decapitated goat carcass as entertainment is pretty sick.
DoctorDee 30 Apr 2007 11:24
7/19
Jack Wallington wrote:
While the Daily Mail may have written about it poorly, I do think having a decapitated goat carcass as entertainment is pretty sick.

So. Let me get this right. Slaughtering an animal for food is OK. As long as we don't enjoy the slaughter.

But what if we enjoy the food?

C'mon, why the f**k is the Daily Mail getting wound up about the slaughter of one freaking goat when they have nothing to say against the slaughter of 65,000 Iraqis?

Star 30 Apr 2007 11:36
8/19
This was a disgusting and tasteless PR stunt and Sony should know better. For once I'm on the Daily Mails side. The earthquake was minor, nothing was seriously damaged, no one was seriously hurt so yes this story deserved to be where it is.
mrFloppy 30 Apr 2007 11:39
9/19
but.... at the end of the day, it was the Mail, known for scaremongering and alarmist journalism to catch attention and thus improve circulation.

It all boils down to this:
- they had a photo with 1) boobs 2) boobs near a dead goat
- a target scapegoat (the games industry) linked to the photo

I would love to have been in the editorial meeting, they must have been so close to running with:

Bare breasted satan worshippers with sacrificial goat carcases run the games industry.


I for one welcome our new pre-dead goat wielding semi naked overlords.
DoctorDee 30 Apr 2007 11:42
10/19
Star wrote:
this story deserved to be where it is.

This story deserved to be in the front page of a national newspaper? My arse!

The only thing that excuses this is the fact that the Mail is now less of a newspaper and more of a joke. I can only imagine that it now serves no purpose other than than to pimp the stocks of companies the editor owns shares in. All those front pages about fad diets and youth potions. It's a joke.

tyrion 30 Apr 2007 12:09
11/19
mrFloppy wrote:
I for one welcome our new pre-dead goat wielding semi naked overlords.

What is this now? Slashdot? Are we to see Natalie Portman covered in hot grits jokes from now on?
mrFloppy 30 Apr 2007 12:12
12/19
tyrion wrote:

What is this now? Slashdot? Are we to see Natalie Portman covered in hot grits jokes from now on?


why not?

as for the goat;

will it blend?
DoctorDee 30 Apr 2007 13:11
13/19
mrFloppy wrote:
tyrion wrote:

What is this now? Slashdot? Are we to see Natalie Portman covered in hot grits jokes from now on?

why not?

Let me count the reasons. How long have you got?

Durden 30 Apr 2007 14:13
14/19
I could go for some goat right now :D People freak out over crap like this all the time, its not even a big deal..
Joji 30 Apr 2007 14:22
15/19
Yeah I heard that, goatmeat makes a damn good curry.

Mmmm....wonder what that would taste like with next doors dogmeat instead.

Lol. I kid, I kid.
Joji 30 Apr 2007 14:28
16/19
Anyway, animals were never meant to be kept as pets, yet some value them more than people, and feed the to death for love apparently. None of that is right either but we many do it.

Shock horror.
hollywooda 1 May 2007 09:56
17/19
nice tits.....
anon 4 May 2007 23:20
18/19
Guppie wrote:
I think a story exposing how one of the biggest companies in the world is setting the example that it's ok to decapitate animals to publicise one of their products


hey, without advertising slaughtered animals you wouldn't have your Mc Donalds and Burger King ads.
PreciousRoi 5 May 2007 11:13
19/19
You think these jackoffs would turn their nose up at some nice tasty veal (MUCH more disturbing than any silly decapitated goat, but no anti-videogame angle there, eh)?

Or would a whole suckling pig with an apple in its mouth be offensive, as long as there was some kind of videogame tie-in and some boobs?
Posting of new comments is now locked for this page.