GTA V Map: Not So Big After All?

> News Comments > SPOnG Comments Index

Topic started: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:47
Click here to view the news article this topic refers to.
Page:123
Dominik
Anonymous
Sat, 14 Sep 2013 16:37
GTA IV bigger than SA? Ridiculous.
maximus
Anonymous
Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:23
This website just went full f**king retard
Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:25
SPONG! Congratulations!
MATHew
Anonymous
Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:27
Just as a side note... Matt, if you're gonna start using terms like 'do the math' you probably should do the math yourself. 49sq miles divided by 13.9 = roughly 3.5.
That doesn't mean it's 350% bigger though. Just like 20 isn't 200% bigger than 10. It's only 100% bigger. So using actual maths, the articles statement that 49sq m is 220% bigger is more accurate than your assumption of 350%
By the way I still think this article is rubbish and wasn't going to waste my time commenting. But it's people like you that mishear telecommercials stats that piss me off
This guy ^^^
Anonymous
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 23:45
@MATHew Oh my god you are dumb. That math is wrong. F**kin dumbass
Anonymous
Anonymous
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 23:55
@MATHew
3.5 = 350%.
fuck
Anonymous
Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:44
this pricks are stupid heaters san andreas bigger than iv
gtav
Anonymous
Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:21
they said gta v map is 27.5 squre miles this article is made by haters
go back to play super mario you dump
IJMA leader RS
Anonymous
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:38
I can't believe how stupid this guy is
ummm
Anonymous
Wed, 6 Nov 2013 12:05
i agree with you too
guess
Anonymous
Wed, 6 Nov 2013 12:22
i'm sure it's a big map but one city make its looks small and most of map are mountains and field
Greg
Anonymous
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 22:41
@Matt
Technically, hes closer to right than you. its about 250% 'bigger'. Your right if you said 350% 'the size' of GTA SA, but not 350% 'bigger' than GTA SA. Its a technicality in the wording, for example if it was 100% bigger, then it'd be doubled (13.9+13.9=27.8). So your 350% 'bigger' is 13.9x3.5+13.9=62.55
Greg
Anonymous
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 22:46
@Matt
Technically, hes closer to right than you. its about 250% 'bigger'. Your right if you said 350% 'the size' of GTA SA, but not 350% 'bigger' than GTA SA. Its a technicality in the wording, for example if it was 100% bigger, then it'd be doubled (13.9+13.9=27.8). So your 350% 'bigger' is 13.9x3.5+13.9=62.55
Greg
Anonymous
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 22:53
This guy ^^^ wrote:
@MATHew Oh my god you are dumb. That math is wrong. F**kin dumbass


how is the math wrong? it is 350% THE SIZE of GTA SA, but not 350% BIGGER than GTA SA.
Greg
Anonymous
Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:13
This is the measurements off the map that came with GTA 5. In the bottom left hand corner there is a key with a measurement scale in both feet and meters. I measured it with a ruler and 1 mile=8.8cm. The map is 44.5cm wide and 70.4cm tall. So 5.06miles wide by 8miles tall. This comes out to be 40.48 square miles. And this includes the large amount of surrounding oceans. Rough measurements of the size land including Alamo Sea (I really broke it down and put a lot of work in to get as accurate as possible) came out to be 22.258 square miles (again this is not including any surrounding ocean, only land, seas, lakes, and rivers)

Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.