In other words, it's because it's not the lead platform.

I think that if a developer chooses to develop on the PS3, it's their responsibility to make whatever they're doing work on the PS3 - thinking of it as secondary is irresponsible, if they were planning to release on it in the first place.

You have the right to say "PS3 is not good enough" if you're not using it, if that's the reason why you're not using it. But making a game on the PS3 and saying "I can't do it properly because it's too hard" is just unprofessional. Even if they said "this feature isn't possible on the PS3 for this reason" that would be more valid.

Activision...go help this idiots:EA,THQ and Valve...they are just fat geeks that dont know s**t.

Well, the PS3 is undoubtedly a very powerful piece of hardware. But it's also obvious that its architecture presents challenges to a lot of developers. Because it is not the typical PC architecture (which is used to develop a lot of games), devs have to come up with new tools to get the job done w/o the performance suffering.

Activision what happened with the PS3 version of COD 4, hum it was sh!tty and still needs patching.

Ther Xbox version has now been fixed and works fine.

BTW fanboys I owe a Wii so I didn't care which is better PS3 or Xbox360

I've had no problems with COD4 on my PS3