The PS3`s Halo it wont be, no matter how hard they attempt it, R: FOM Wasnt the best game I ever played but it wasn’t bad either although there really wasn’t anything to play at the time, I expect nothing more for the sequel.
In regards to religious implications, it would make them very silly if they did included places of worship that you can go and shoot up!, why not offend politically with it being set in the US, how about we get to Shoot up the Pentagon or The White House, After all Mr. Bush protects the rights for `Gun Nuts` everywhere to own guns, would that right be protected in a WWII with aliens?.

I didnt like the look of the first one to be honest was just Call of duty with aliens imo.

As said above it will never be a HALO infact HALO is quite unique the first one anyways.

Killzone 2 is now something that catches my eye.

Why is there this impulse to compare every PlayStation-based first-person shooter with Halo?

Since Sony said Killzone 1 before being launched would be a HALO beater...Biggest joke ever imo.

I know there are those that hate HALO and those that love it like me, the thing with HALO 1 was it just had something unique about how it was and will always be the best shooter of all time imo.

But Sony didn't.

It was one of the PS2 rags that kicked the whole thing off when its cover screamed "Halo Beater".

Sony never mention Halo