Firstly I just want to point out that this is NOT the same Atari from the 80's. The company quite clearly pointed this out some time ago that they should not be confused with Atari from the 80's as its not the same company.

The company has published many crap games as this is very clear, they had great franchises but the games were usually rather terrible and had poor visuals.

I hope they lose the Dragonball Z franchise as if Atari wanted to make money they would have released it on the Xbox 360 as well. They chose the cheapest options being the PS2 and the Wii.

To make money you gots to spend money and being a 360 and PS3 owner well luckily I have the 60gb model so will be purchasing the PS2 version - heres hoping it works.

Had it been on the 360 I am sure many 360 owners would have bought the game as well.

Would this be the same money they clearly stated (above, in the article) that they simply don't have? I can see how they totally should have spent that, yeah.

Let's not getting picky here.

Atari hasn't been itself (the 1971 edition) since 1976, when Warner bought it and rent it asunder, creating Atari Corp (home) and Atari Games (arcade).

Since then both Ataris (Atarii?) have endured corporate wife swapping, gang rape, identity issues, death and resurrection.

Just take a look at the SPOnG's Atari company history to see just how un-Atari Atari has been for the last three decades.

E.T. finally caught up with them......