If my PStwo died on me now I would so go and get one of those.

I agree if someone don't already have a PS2 i can't see them getting one with the PS3 (unless they missed that it no longer is BC)

Interesting, 65 games, most of which I do not want compared to the thousands of PS2/PS1 titles, is not enough. Real reasons, Let's think tank: they make lots more money on new games, and now I guess they could also make an emulator to download your old games over the Internet (at an price). I wonder of that is legal under anti-trusts considerations (actually there are also an number of constriction of supply problems in the console industry that might be begging for an MS anti-trust like full beating).

I glanced the article, are they saying they are taking the PS3 forward, and keeping the PS2 (as they did with the PS1)?

Yeah I agree, an spoiler for the Wii, with PS2 undercutting and the others offering hardcore game play

Now what might it look like, here is an rendition:
http://forums.spong.com/en/html/forum/viewThread.jsp?forum=8&thread=6430&message=36806&cb=1194246242843

Engadget has an picture, and looks pretty much like the present one (is that an picture in this article).

How come this website makes my browser run like an dog?