Video game forum >
EditorialUncharted 2: Among Thieves
Topic started: 5 Oct 2009 @ 18:06
Click here to view the editorial this topic refers to.
This forum allows anonymous posting.
Tue, Oct 6, 09 @ 17:36
king skins wrote:
I agree, but not with the 1-5 thing. Just have the review on its own with a summary at the end.
Yeah, the 1-5 thing is tongue in cheek. What does everybody else think about dropping scores and so that people have to read the review and make some kind of decision based on that?
cheers
Tim
Editorial Director - SPOnG.com
'Blame Me - tim@spong.com'
'Blame Me - tim@spong.com'
2 direct replies to this message.
Tue, Oct 6, 09 @ 18:16
Aw, I liked the 1-5. :3
I've thought for a while that numbers are just way too much hassle than they're worth - this topic is pretty much proof that many people simply don't read the review or jump on the number as a means to try to contradict what was said in the review.
Somewhere people lost the concept that the number is merely a quick-fire indicator to supplement the full text, not a basis on which the review text is bound to. But while getting rid of the scores allow for the audience to truly read the piece to obtain the definitive view of the outlet, the Internet isn't the best medium to read long articles in itself. The average 'net user skims, rather than reads, and picks up highlights along the way.
Maybe lose the score, keep the Summary at the end (as that appears to be sufficient for a 'roundup' paragraph or something) would help. Perhaps a small "Plus / Minus" segment with what was loved/hated? Assuming such an idea isn't considered too... well, 'beige'.
I've thought for a while that numbers are just way too much hassle than they're worth - this topic is pretty much proof that many people simply don't read the review or jump on the number as a means to try to contradict what was said in the review.
Somewhere people lost the concept that the number is merely a quick-fire indicator to supplement the full text, not a basis on which the review text is bound to. But while getting rid of the scores allow for the audience to truly read the piece to obtain the definitive view of the outlet, the Internet isn't the best medium to read long articles in itself. The average 'net user skims, rather than reads, and picks up highlights along the way.
Maybe lose the score, keep the Summary at the end (as that appears to be sufficient for a 'roundup' paragraph or something) would help. Perhaps a small "Plus / Minus" segment with what was loved/hated? Assuming such an idea isn't considered too... well, 'beige'.
The Sonic Stadium - The #1 Sonic Fansite. Ooh, SEGA love us.
http://www.sonicstadium.org/
http://www.sonicstadium.org/
1 direct reply to this message.
Tue, Oct 6, 09 @ 20:55
meh.
I say keep the scores...no reason to let inmates bussed in from outside the asylum any say in the matter
Y'know, I had thought that most of the fanboys had migrated to the 360 (and I was more than a little depressed by this) but I suppose this proves that Sony is still the fanboy platform of choice. That or something about the PS3 MAKES you stupid. I just don't get it...
I say keep the scores...no reason to let inmates bussed in from outside the asylum any say in the matter
Y'know, I had thought that most of the fanboys had migrated to the 360 (and I was more than a little depressed by this) but I suppose this proves that Sony is still the fanboy platform of choice. That or something about the PS3 MAKES you stupid. I just don't get it...
Gott weiß ich will kein Engel sein
No replies to this message.
Wed, Oct 7, 09 @ 00:12
Edge tried to drop the scores from their reviews in one issue and everyone complained, even though they published the scores at the end of the review section. You might loose some readers...
To be honest I do flick to the end of some reviews to see the score and then decide if i want to read the review, but I only do that for games I'm vaguely interested in, but if I read a review I read the whole thing.
It would be controversial but its something I've thought magazines/website should have done a long time ago.
To be honest I do flick to the end of some reviews to see the score and then decide if i want to read the review, but I only do that for games I'm vaguely interested in, but if I read a review I read the whole thing.
It would be controversial but its something I've thought magazines/website should have done a long time ago.
--------------------------------------------
you want me to bitch slap you? i will
http://www.yellowsoft.co.uk
you want me to bitch slap you? i will
http://www.yellowsoft.co.uk
1 direct reply to this message.
Wed, Oct 7, 09 @ 08:51
king skins wrote:
Edge tried to drop the scores from their reviews in one issue and everyone complained, even though they published the scores at the end of the review section.
If I remember correctly they used P.N. 03 as an example piece that they got other industry types to review
king skins wrote:
To be honest I do flick to the end of some reviews to see the score and then decide if i want to read the review, but I only do that for games I'm vaguely interested in, but if I read a review I read the whole thing.
It would be controversial but its something I've thought magazines/website should have done a long time ago.
It would be controversial but its something I've thought magazines/website should have done a long time ago.
I do a similar thing as well, I think getting rid of the score is worth trying with the added inclusion of something like the plus, minus/good, bad & ugly points at the end.
Then maybe include something like how many people in the SPOnG office are playing it.
Do I feel a poll coming .....
__________________________________
Mr Flibble says, "Game over, boys"
Mr Flibble says, "Game over, boys"
1 direct reply to this message.
